Doesn't cost much, but I also don't have 10TB that falls into this category. The idea being, even if my primary QNAP (453be) went total kaput, I would have a backup within seconds of everything important.Ĥ) Finally, a nightly backup to AWS for all my "mission critical" and irreplaceable stuff like family photos, etc. It would take a lonnnng time to upload 10TB on most home internet circuits.Įven with 600+ movies and all my other stuff, I'm only using ~3TB in storage on my QNAP.ġ) RAID-6 for 2-drive failure resiliency (not a backup, but still worth mentioning).Ģ) Nightly backup of everything to external USB drive for first level of backup.ģ) RTRR (real time replication) of all my important and misc data to a second QNAP upstairs. Your best bet would likely be, assuming you can't cut that 10TB down tremendously, setup your own remote server or NAS and backup to that - which would also make the initial sync, which could be done locally, that much quicker. With that said, you could look at doing a roll your own solution, but even VPS solutions will generally be about $50/month or more for that much storage. Maybe another ~100GB of longer videos I keep separate.īut to answer your question, yes, cloud backup solutions for the QNAP can be expensive. I have tons of personal photos going back over a decade and am only using ~100GB for all of them. You have 10TB of "photos, home videos and other personal files"? That seems, at least to me, a bit excessive. Of course, this does not really help if you need discreet access to individual files unless you also keep your originals at home. Amazon offers a glacial service where you ship physical media, but it can get really expensive if you need to recover because they ship everything to you again. If you do it correctly, you would be buying new archival media every few years instead of just adding to it, but that's likely to be cheaper in the long run than a cloud backup solution for that size. At the end of a year or so, make a new archival recovery snapshot, clear out the cloud storage, and start over. Basically, you create an archive copy that can be sent back to you, and use the cloud storage only for new stuff incrementally. I know quite a few pro photographers who are in a similar position to you, and their solution is to buy archival drives and/or media and store a snapshot in one or more off-site locations such as a safe deposit box. It sounds like what you actually need is disaster recovery instead of a true backup. This is a business-tier size, to be sure. Is there a service that serves this middle-ground home user with large storage needs? I'm only looking to backup a personal computer with photos, home videos, and other personal files. I get it that business server use is more expensive. Plus another $100 to download if I ever needed to restore those 10TBs. Again, Backblaze seems to be the least expensive (B2), but the same exact data in this setup would cost 10x as much ($50/month for 10TB). I would have to move to a more expensive tier. From what I have read, the regular cloud service will not support this setup. However, I plan to move everything to a QNAP NAS in the very near future. From what I understand, I could use the "Backblaze" cloud service and back up everything for $5/month (unlimited storage). My total file storage is getting close to 10TB. I currently have a collection of internal/external drives on my home computer. Are there any reasonably priced cloud backup options that would support a QNAP server?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |